Rodriguez-Preciado

United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 200503-30285California12,613 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30285 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-96-00311- ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, aka ALH-(2) Tony Rodriguez-Preciado,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Filed March 4, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace; Partial Dissent by Judge Berzon COUNSEL

James F. Halley, Portland, Oregon, for the defendant- appellant.

Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, and J. Russell Ratto, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Rodriguez-Preciado appeals from his conviction for various narcotics-related offenses. He argues that the district court improperly denied his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence obtained from his person, his motel room, and his vehicle, as well as statements that he made in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.