Barapind
Barapind v. Enomoto
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 200502-16944California8,054 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KULVIR SINGH BARAPIND,
Petitioner-Appellant, No. 02-16944 v. JERRY J. ENOMOTO, United States D.C. No.
CV-01-06215-OWW
Marshal for the Eastern District of
OPINION
California, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 14, 2004—San Francisco, California
Filed March 9, 2005
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Alex Kozinski, Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rymer
3003 3006 BARAPIND v. ENOMOTO
COUNSEL
Jagdip Singh Sekhon, Sekhon & Sekhon, San Francisco, Cali- fornia, for the appellant. BARAPIND v. ENOMOTO 3007 Stanley A. Boone, Assistant United States Attorney, Fresno, California, for the appellee.