Barapind

Barapind v. Enomoto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 200502-16944California8,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KULVIR SINGH BARAPIND, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 02-16944 v. JERRY J. ENOMOTO, United States  D.C. No.

CV-01-06215-OWW

Marshal for the Eastern District of

OPINION

California, Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 14, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed March 9, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Alex Kozinski, Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rymer

3003 3006 BARAPIND v. ENOMOTO

COUNSEL

Jagdip Singh Sekhon, Sekhon & Sekhon, San Francisco, Cali- fornia, for the appellant. BARAPIND v. ENOMOTO 3007 Stanley A. Boone, Assistant United States Attorney, Fresno, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

We consider whether the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.