Gonzalez Rosalez v. Holder

Good Law
359 F. App'x 898
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 200907-70760California226 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alberto Gonzalez Rosalez, Martha Alicia Bacilio, and their child, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand and review de novo due process claims alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

We agree with the BIA that the petitioners failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel. See Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1027 (9th Cir.2004).

In the motion to remand, petitioners presented evidence that Martha had given birth to twins, but did not claim that the new children would suffer hardship. The remaining evidence presented with the motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as their application for cancellation of removal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that petitioners failed to establish the requisite…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.