Thomas
Thomas v. Fry's Electronics
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVE THOMAS, No. 03-56306 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-02-1831 TJW/ FRY’S ELECTRONICS, INC., a JFS California Corporation,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 8, 2005* Pasadena, California
Filed March 15, 2005
Before: Thomas G. Nelson, Barry G. Silverman, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
3303 3304 THOMAS v. FRY’S ELECTRONICS
COUNSEL
Scott A. McMillan, The McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, Cali- fornia, for the appellant. THOMAS v. FRY’S ELECTRONICS 3305 James D. Claytor and William H. Curtis, Foley McIntosh Frey & Claytor, Lafayette, California, for the appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Steve Thomas brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s denial of his anti-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Purpose1 (“anti-SLAPP”)…