Mondero

Mondero v. Salt River Project

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 200503-16173California4,147 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcón, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYLVIA MONDERO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-16173 v. SALT RIVER PROJECT, a political  D.C. No.

CV-01-02465-FJM

subdivision of the State of

OPINION

Arizona, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 16, 2005—San Francisco, California

Filed March 15, 2005

Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,* and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Alarcón

*The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

3271 3274 MONDERO v. SALT RIVER PROJECT

COUNSEL

John A. Conley, Law Office of James Burr Shields, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellant.

John J. Egbert, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, Phoenix, Ari- zona, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:

Sylvia Mondero appeals from the order granting Salt River Project’s (“SRP”) summary judgment motion to dismiss her claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.