United States v. Nelson Ayala-Duran

Good Law
360 F. App'x 773
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 200908-10160, 08-10161California259 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

In these consolidated appeals, Nelson Ayala-Duran appeals from: (1) his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a); and (2) the district court’s revocation of his supervised release and imposition of a 36-month concurrent sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ayala-Duran’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief in either appeal, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record in both appeals. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. We remand in case # 2:07-cr-00564-SMM for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment so that it is consistent with the district court’s oral pronouncement regarding applicability of the fine. See, e.g., United States v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.