Liboria Partida-Sanchez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
361 F. App'x 744
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 200908-74444California266 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Liboria Partida-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s denial of Partida-Sanchez’s motion to reopen, which introduced further evidence of hardship to her United States citizen child. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (explaining that § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) bars jurisdiction when question presented in motion to reopen is essentially the same hardship ground originally decided).

The Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Partida-Sanchez’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any errors of fact or law in the Board’s order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1); see also Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176 , 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). Partida-Sanchez challenges the constitutionality of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (NACARA) and contends it violates the Equal Protection Clause by treating individuals differently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.