Falcon Stainless, Inc. v. Rino Companies, Inc.

Good Law
360 F. App'x 825
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 200909-55246California148 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Falcon Stainless, Inc. appeals the district court’s denial of its request for pre liminary injunctive relief against defendant-appellees Rino Companies, Inc., Performance Sales, Inc., Southsea Metal, Inc., John Novello and Herry Rieger. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.