Santiago

Santiago v. Rumsfeld

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 200505-35005California203 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIANO SANTIAGO, 

Petitioner-Appellant, v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; LES BROWNLEE, Secretary No. 05-35005 of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); RAYMOND  D.C. No.

CV-04-01747-OMP

BYRNE, Acting Adjutant General of

ORDER

the Oregon National Guard; DAVID DORAN, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, Senior Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 6, 2005—Seattle, Washington

Filed April 6, 2005

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Richard C. Tallman, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Steven Goldberg, Esq., Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart and Gib- son, LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellant.

4173 4174 SANTIAGO v. RUMSFELD H. Thomas Byron, III, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the appellees.

ORDER

The appellant’s urgent motion for injunction pending appeal, which seeks to enjoin his deployment to Afghanistan, is DENIED.

The judgment of the District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.