Santiago

Santiago v. Rumsfeld

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 200505-35005California181 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIANO SANTIAGO, 

Petitioner-Appellant, v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; LES BROWNLEE, Secretary No. 05-35005 of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); RAYMOND  D.C. No.

CV-04-01747-OMP

BYRNE, Acting Adjutant General of

ORDER

the Oregon National Guard; DAVID DORAN, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees.  Filed April 7, 2005

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator.

ORDER

The request for initial hearing en banc on the Appellant’s motion for an injunction pending appeal was referred to the entire court. No judge requested a vote of the active non- recused judges on the initial hearing en banc request within the time established for requesting a vote.

Therefore, the request for initial hearing en banc on the motion for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED. The panel shall resume control of the case.

4175

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.