John Doe I v. Unocal Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 200500-56603California320 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN DOE I, individually & as Administrator of the Estate of his deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; JANE DOE, I, on behalf of herself, as Adminstratrix of the Estate of her deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOHN DOE II;
JOHN DOE III; JOHN DOE IV; JOHN
DOE V; JANE DOE II; JANE DOE III;
JOHN DOE VI; JOHN DOE VII; JOHN Nos. 00-56603
DOE VIII; JOHN DOE IX; JOHN DOE 00-57197
X; JOHN DOE XI, on behalf of D.C. No. themselves & all others similarly CV-96-06959- situated & Louisa Benson on RSWL behalf of herself & the general public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation; TOTAL S.A., a Foreign Corporation; JOHN IMLE, an individual; ROGER C. BEACH, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.
4171 4172 DOE v. UNOCAL CORP.
JOHN ROE III; JOHN ROE VII; JOHN Nos. 00-56628
ROE VIII; JOHN ROE X,
00-57195 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. D.C. No.