John Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 200500-56603California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DOE I, individually & as  Administrator of the Estate of his deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; JANE DOE, I, on behalf of herself, as Adminstratrix of the Estate of her deceased child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOHN DOE II;

JOHN DOE III; JOHN DOE IV; JOHN

DOE V; JANE DOE II; JANE DOE III;

JOHN DOE VI; JOHN DOE VII; JOHN Nos. 00-56603

DOE VIII; JOHN DOE IX; JOHN DOE 00-57197

X; JOHN DOE XI, on behalf of  D.C. No. themselves & all others similarly CV-96-06959- situated & Louisa Benson on RSWL behalf of herself & the general public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation; TOTAL S.A., a Foreign Corporation; JOHN IMLE, an individual; ROGER C. BEACH, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. 

4171 4172 DOE v. UNOCAL CORP.

JOHN ROE III; JOHN ROE VII; JOHN  Nos. 00-56628

ROE VIII; JOHN ROE X,

00-57195 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No.

CV-96-06112-

UNOCAL CORPORATION;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.