Nuru

Nuru v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 200503-71391California11,892 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UKASHU NURU, aka Ukasha Nuru,  Petitioner, No. 03-71391 v.  Agency No.

A77-954-387

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 1, 2004 Vacated February 23, 2005 Resubmitted March 24, 2005** Pasadena, California

Filed April 21, 2005

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, A. Wallace Tashima, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Steve Paek, Law Offices of Steve Paek, Los Angeles, Califor- nia, for the petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Donald E. Keener, Francis W. Fraser, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Warfare still…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.