Loera Aquino v. Holder

Good Law
360 F. App'x 953
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 201007-70284California226 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Miriam Loera Aquino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in ab-sentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Salta v. INS, 314 F.3d 1076, 1078 (9th Cir.2002), we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The IJ denied Loera Aquino’s motion to reopen based on failure to receive the hearing notice primarily because she had not initiated removal proceedings and had not appeared at any previous hearings. See Salta, 314 F.3d at 1079 . The IJ therefore found that her sworn declaration did not suffice to overcome the presumption of effective service of her hearing notice. At the time of its decision, the agency did not have the benefit of our decision in Sembiring v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 981, 988-90 (9th Cir.2007) (holding that alien’s statement overcame presumption of effective service where no prior hearings scheduled, and alien had no motivation to avoid hearing). We therefore remand for reconsideration of Loera Aquino’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.