United States v. Smith

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 200503-30533California3,134 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30533 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-60101-1-

TIMOTHY DEAN SMITH,  ALA

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Filed December 3, 2004 Amended April 27, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace COUNSEL

Craig E. Weinerman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eugene, Oregon, for the defendant-appellant.

Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

The court’s opinion filed December 3, 2004, slip op. 16459, and appearing at 390 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 2004), is hereby amended as follows:

1. Line seven on slip op. 16467, after citation to Bonat, 106 F.3d at 1477, insert: “The Supreme Court has recently approved the use of a plea colloquy transcript.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.