Ogles

United States v. Ogles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 200503-10439California7,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

BEA, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-10439 v.  D.C. No.

JOHN GILBERT OGLES, CR-02-01805-CKJ

Defendant-Appellee. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-10069 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-02-01805-CKJ

JOHN GILBERT OGLES,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 4, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed April 28, 2005

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Richard C. Tallman, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bea; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rymer COUNSEL

Paul K. Charlton, United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, Maria Davila, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, and Michael A. Rotker, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the government.

Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, Virginia, for defendant John Gilbert Ogles.

OPINION

BEA,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.