Lopez-Umanzor

Lopez-Umanzor v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 200503-72014California5,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALINA LOPEZ-UMANZOR, 

Petitioner, No. 03-72014 v.  Agency No.

A75-011-140

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2005—Seattle, Washington

Filed May 6, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, and Alfred T. Goodwin and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Graber

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

4879 4882 LOPEZ-UMANZOR v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Mara Kimmel, Catholic Social Services, for the petitioner.

James E. Grimes and Thomas K. Ragland, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

David R. Fine, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Gail L. Pendleton, Associate Director, National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Boston,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.