Santiago

Santiago v. Rumsfeld

Good Law
407 F.3d 1018·2005 WL 1125582
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 200505-35005California3,918 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Emiliano Santiago, a sergeant in the Army National Guard facing immediate deployment to Afghanistan, appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Santiago’s eight-year enlistment in the Guard was due to expire on June 27, 2004, but shortly before that date his enlistment was extended by a “stop-loss” order when his unit was alerted prior to being ordered to active service. Santiago challenges this application of the government’s “stop-loss” policy on the ground that it violates his enlistment contract and is unauthorized by statute. He also asserts a due process claim. We affirm the district court’s denial of the petition because we conclude that the stop-loss order was authorized by 10 U.S.C. § 12305 (a), and that it neither violated Santiago’s enlistment agreement nor his right to due process of law.

I. Factual Background

Santiago enlisted in the Army National Guard on June 28, 1996, when he was eighteen years old. He enlisted for a term of eight years. After his enlistment, Santiago completed basic training and advanced individual training, after which he was released from active duty. Since that time, Santiago has been participating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.