Lasting

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Good Law
408 F.3d 596·2005 WL 1175927
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 200501-56055California5,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

I. Introduction

This case concerns the term “micro colors” and who has the right to use it. The parties use the term “micro color,” “micro-color,” and “micro colors” interchangeably. For purposes of this opinion, we will refer to the term as “micro color” or “micro colors.” The minor difference in these terms has no significance in this action. Lasting Impression I, Inc., owns an incontestable, registered trademark, which consists of the term “micro colors,” set in white, within a black box. It is the registration for this composite mark that is the basis of this litigation.

K.P. Permanent Make-Up, Inc. (“KP”) uses the term “micro colors” on its products and brochures. Upon receiving a cease and desist letter from Lasting Impression I, Inc., in January 2000 demanding KP discontinue its use of the term “micro color,” KP brought this action for declaratory relief against the defendants Lasting Impression I, Inc., and its distributor, MCN International, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Lasting”). KP asserted that Lasting did not have the exclusive right to use the term “micro colors” and that the term was generic and incapable of receiving trademark…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.