Rivas-Almendarez

Rivas-Almendarez v. Holder

Good Law
362 F. App'x 606
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 201007-70707California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Walter Ernesto Rivas-Almendarez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturri-barria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rivas-Almendarez’s motion to reopen to rescind his deportation order because the hearing notice was sent by regular mail to the address last provided by Rivas-Almendarez, as was acceptable un der the regulations in force at the time. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (3)(B)(1) (1990) (requiring notice of hearing but not specifying form of service required); 8 C.F.R. § 3.17 (1990) (same); Matter of Munoz-Santos, 20 I. & N. Dec. 205, 207 (BIA 1990) (routine service to last address provided was adequate for notice of hearing); cf. Sembiring v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 981, 988-90 (9th Cir.2007) (describing evidence sufficient to overcome presumption of effective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.