Callum

United States v. Callum

Good Law
410 F.3d 571·2005 WL 1206805
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 200502-10210, 02-10471, 02-10242, 02-10243California3,444 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The government’s motion to amend the opinion and delay publication is GRANTED.

The opinion filed on April 20, 2005 [ 404 F.3d 1150 ], is amended as follows. On page 1152, the phrase “Jeffrey Cole, the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) supervising the investigation,” is replaced with “the Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) supervising the investigation”. A footnote is inserted after the word “investigation” that reads: “The AUSA who supervised the investigation is not the one who argued this case for the government.”

Additionally, Judge Pregerson’s special concurrence is deleted.

OPINION

The federal wiretapping statute requires court orders approving wiretaps to “specify ... the identity ... of the [Department of Justice official] authorizing the [wiretap] application.” We decide whether suppression is required when wiretap orders and corresponding applications say nothing about who authorized them.

FACTS

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) suspected defendants Barnes and Henderson of participating in a drug trafficking ring in Northern California. After unsuccessfully exhausting conventional investigative techniques, DEA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.