Cleghorn

Cleghorn v. Blue Shield of California

Good Law
408 F.3d 1222·2005 WL 1206812
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 200503-55528California1,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

We are presented once again with a question concerning the degree to which the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) preempts state law. Douglas D. Cleghorn is a participant in his employer’s ERISA health plan offered by Blue Shield of California (doing business as CareAmerica) (“Blue Shield”). On one occasion he sought and received emergency medical services and Blue Shield denied reimbursement. Cleghorn sued Blue Shield in California state court, asserting state-law causes of action and alleging that Blue Shield had violated an emergency . care provision in section 1371.4(c) of the California Health and Safety Code.

Blue Shield removed the case to federal court and the district court held that Cleg-horn’s claims were preempted by ERISA. When Cleghorn declined to amend his complaint to allege an ERISA claim, the district court dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. Background

Through his employer, Cleghorn became a member of a Blue Shield health plan. He subsequently sought and received emergency medical care for an episode of dizziness, imminent loss of consciousness, weakness, muscle fatigue,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.