Hendricks

Hendricks v. Bank of America

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 200503-55754California6,992 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIANE M. HENDRICKS; KENNETH A. 

HENDRICKS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 03-55754 v. D.C. No.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendant,  CV-02-03150-GHK

ORDER AND

and AMENDED

MUTUAL INDEMNITY (BERMUDA), OPINION

LTD., a Bermuda corporation, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. King, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 14, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed February 25, 2005 Amended May 24, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, John T. Noonan, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace COUNSEL

Vincent J. Connelly, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Mawe, Chicago, Illinois, for the defendant-appellant.

Bruce R. Meckler, Meckler Bulger & Tilson, Chicago, Illi- nois, and Robert G. Campbell, Cox Castle & Nicholson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

ORDER

The court’s opinion filed February 25, 2005, slip op. 2209, and appearing at 398 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2005), is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.