Arevalo

United States v. Arevalo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 200502-50289California3,087 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-50289 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-99-00083-DOC- MARCEL AREVALO, aka Psycho, 06 Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 9, 2005* Pasadena, California

Filed May 26, 2005

Before: Melvin Brunetti, Barry G. Silverman, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Tallman

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

5773 5776 UNITED STATES v. AREVALO

COUNSEL

Jerry Sies, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant- appellant.

Robert E. Dugdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Terror- ism and Organized Crime Section, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Marcel Arevalo again attempts to appeal his sentence and conviction on two counts of conspiracy to distribute a con- trolled substance, 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.