Harrington
United States v. Harrington
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-30413 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-94-00455-JET
JOHN FRANCIS HARRINGTON,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Jack E. Tanner, Senior Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 12, 2005* Seattle, Washington
Filed June 6, 2005
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Alfred T. Goodwin, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Chief Judge Schroeder
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL
John F. Harrington, pro se, Taft, California, defendant- appellant.
Ronald J. Friedman, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:
Federal prisoner John Francis Harrington filed a “Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence” under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, after he had unsuc- cessfully pursued a direct appeal and a habeas corpus petition. Harrington had…