Oroujyan

Oroujyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
362 F. App'x 778
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201006-70347California288 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Sirvard Oroujyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Oroujyan’s testimony was inconsistent with her declaration concerning the details of her escape from the September 1999 attack and concerning whether her February 2000 attackers threatened her with a gun or a knife, see Chebchoub, 257 F.3d at 1043 (inconsistencies in the details of events that form the basis for the asylum claim go to the heart of the claim and support an adverse credibility finding), and the IJ reasonably found Oroujyan’s explanations for the discrepancies unconvincing, see Rivera v. Mulcasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th Cir.2007). In the absence of credible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.