Perez-Enriquez

Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 200503-70244California178 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ, 

Petitioner, No. 03-70244 v.  Agency No.

A92-002-074

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed June 14, 2005

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and William O. Bertelsman,** Senior Judge.

OPINION

The panel’s September 9, 2004, opinion is withdrawn. The new opinion is filed concurrently with this order. The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing or suggestion for rehearing en banc as provided for by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

7029

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.