Perez-Enriquez

Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 200503-70244California2,082 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ, 

Petitioner, No. 03-70244 v.  Agency No.

A92-002-074

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 6, 2004—Seattle, Washington

Filed June 14, 2005

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and William O. Bertelsman,** Senior Judge.

Opinion by Judge Callahan

*Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. COUNSEL

Petitioner was represented by Robert H. Gibbs of Seattle, Washington, at argument and by Raul R. Labrador of Nampa, Idaho, on his brief.

Respondent was represented by Isaac Campbell of Washing- ton, D.C., at oral argument and by Assistant Attorney General Peter D. Keisler, Assistant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.