Matt O'Dea v. Bnsf Railway Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201008-35525California184 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MATT O’DEA, No. 08-35525

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 6:07-CV-00069-CCL

v.

ORDER*

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

AND INDUSTRY; MONTANA HUMAN

RIGHTS COMMISSION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2010 Seattle, Washington

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Before: KLEINFELD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and SETTLE,** District Judge.

We lack jurisdiction over an appeal from a remand order entered due to a

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447; Carlsbad Tech. Inc. v.

HIF Bio, Inc., --- U.S. --- , 129 S. Ct. 1862, 1865–66 (2009). Costs on appeal are

awarded to Appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 39.

DISMISSED.

** Honorable Benjamin Hale Settle, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.