Matt O'Dea v. Bnsf Railway Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201008-35525California184 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 20 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
MATT O’DEA, No. 08-35525
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 6:07-CV-00069-CCL
v.
ORDER*
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND INDUSTRY; MONTANA HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMISSION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 13, 2010 Seattle, Washington
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Before: KLEINFELD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and SETTLE,** District Judge.
We lack jurisdiction over an appeal from a remand order entered due to a
lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447; Carlsbad Tech. Inc. v.
HIF Bio, Inc., --- U.S. --- , 129 S. Ct. 1862, 1865–66 (2009). Costs on appeal are
awarded to Appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 39.
DISMISSED.
** Honorable Benjamin Hale Settle, United States…