Ruelas

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-50600 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-99-01363-CAS Central District

GEORGE MICHAEL RUELAS,

Defendant-Appellant. of California,  Los Angeles

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-50660 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CR-99-01363-CAS

GEORGE MICHAEL RUELAS,

ORDER

Defendant-Appellee.  Filed June 16, 2005

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon remand from the United States Supreme Court, we have reconsidered this case in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ___, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), and we there- fore order that the memorandum disposition filed on May 5, 2004 be amended as follows:

Page 2, line 9: Delete the phrase “and we affirm” from the sentence beginning with “We have jurisdiction . . . .” Add a new sentence stating, “We affirm Ruelas’s conviction, and

7191 7192 UNITED STATES v. RUELAS remand in accordance with United States v. Ameline, No. 02- 30326, slip op. at 6368-71 (9th…