Camacho Blancas v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201007-73048California299 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICARDO CAMACHO BLANCAS; No. 07-73048
FRANCISCA CORDOVA CAMACHO,
Agency Nos. A075-507-129 Petitioners, A075-533-230
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 11, 2010 **
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ricardo Camacho Blancas and Francisca Cordova Camacho, husband and
wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
denial of a motion to reopen.…