Camacho Blancas v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201007-73048California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO CAMACHO BLANCAS; No. 07-73048

FRANCISCA CORDOVA CAMACHO,

Agency Nos. A075-507-129 Petitioners, A075-533-230

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010 **

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Camacho Blancas and Francisca Cordova Camacho, husband and

wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.