Buenrostro

Buenrostro v. Holder

Good Law
362 F. App'x 788
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 201006-75305California125 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Rosa Buenrostro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Buenrostro’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s May 24, 2006, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.