Mary Ganley v. County of San Mateo
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 201008-15909California394 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARY GANLEY, an individual, No. 08-15909
Plaintiff - Appellant, DC No. 3:06-CV-06-3923 THE
v.
MEMORANDUM *
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Thelton E. Henderson, U.S. District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 9, 2009 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, THOMPSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The district court correctly determined the County did not violate Ganley’s
due process rights in removing her from her position as a correctional officer. See
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S.319, 334-35 (1976). At the meetings of June 6 and
June 21, 2005, Ganley was fully informed of the consequences of the medical
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. reports from the County’s physician and from her treating physician, both of whom
concluded she could not perform…