Mujahid
Mujahid v. Daniels
Opinion
Opinion
Beezer COUNSEL, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SABIL M. MUJAHID, No. 03-36038 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-02-01719-GMK/ CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden, JMS Respondent-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 11, 2005—San Francisco, California
Filed June 27, 2005
Before: Robert R. Beezer, Sidney R. Thomas, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Beezer COUNSEL
Stephen R. Sady, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant.
Kenneth C. Bauman and Craig J. Casey, Assistant United States Attorneys, Portland, Oregon, for the respondent- appellee.
OPINION
BEEZER, Circuit Judge
Sabil Mujahid appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging the Bureau of Prisons’ (“BOP” or “Bureau”) interpretation of the maxi- mum good time credit a federal prisoner can receive under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). Mujahid asserts that the Bureau’s interpre-…