National Labor Relations Board v. Brotherhood Of Teamsters And Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70 Of Alameda County

Good Law
459 F.2d 694·80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2464·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 197271-1155California1,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

459 F.2d 694 80 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2464 , 68 Lab.Cas. P 12,669 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS AND AUTO TRUCK DRIVERS LOCAL NO. 70 OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. 71-1155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 4, 1972. William Wachter (argued), Herbert Fishgold, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Edward M. Kovach (argued), Duane Beeson, of Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, Robert M. Lieber, of Littler, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District Judge. ELY, Circuit Judge: 1 The sole issue in this enforcement proceeding concerns the interpretation of sections of the National Labor Relations Act declaring it an unfair labor practice for a labor organization either to restrain or coerce an employer in the selection of his bargaining representative, section 8(b) (1) (B), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (b) (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.