Romo

United States v. Romo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 200504-30131California4,682 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a confession Romo made during a meeting with Donald LaPlante, the Program Director at the Dawson County Adult Correction and Detention Facility where Romo was incarcerated. LaPlante is a licensed profes- sional counselor whose job included providing inmates with psychological counseling and a host of other duties, ranging from arranging social events to providing classes and acting as a case manager. Before the meeting that sparked the chain 7800 UNITED STATES v. ROMO of events leading to Romo’s conviction, LaPlante had pro- vided Romo with mental health treatment during voluntary counseling sessions.

In October 2002, Romo requested a meeting with LaPlante. Although Romo did not have a counseling session scheduled and LaPlante did not know why Romo wanted to see him, the two met in a private visitation room at the detention facility. Romo immediately confessed that he had written a threaten- ing letter to the President. Before Romo went any further, LaPlante warned that he would have to report the letter to law enforcement officials. Despite the warning, Romo went on to tell LaPlante exactly what he had written: that someone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.