Allen

Juan H. v. Allen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 200504-15562California331 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 08 2005

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JUAN H., No. 04-15562

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-02-02018-CW Northern District of California, v. Oakland

WALTER ALLEN, III,

ORDER

Respondent - Appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed on June 2, 2005, and published at 408 F.3d 1262, is

AMENDED as follows:

The content of footnote 8 states:

Aside from determining whether a state court has unreasonably applied a

provision of federal law or the Constitution, under § 2254(d)(2), a federal

court may also grant a writ of habeas corpus if a material factual finding of

the state court reflects “an unreasonable determination of the facts in light

of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. §

2254(d)(2). In making this inquiry, we must presume that any state court

factual finding is correct, and the petitioner has the burden of proving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.