Allen
Juan H. v. Allen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 200504-15562California331 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 08 2005
CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JUAN H., No. 04-15562
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-02-02018-CW Northern District of California, v. Oakland
WALTER ALLEN, III,
ORDER
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The opinion filed on June 2, 2005, and published at 408 F.3d 1262, is
AMENDED as follows:
The content of footnote 8 states:
Aside from determining whether a state court has unreasonably applied a
provision of federal law or the Constitution, under § 2254(d)(2), a federal
court may also grant a writ of habeas corpus if a material factual finding of
the state court reflects “an unreasonable determination of the facts in light
of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. §
2254(d)(2). In making this inquiry, we must presume that any state court
factual finding is correct, and the petitioner has the burden of proving…