John Gabor v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 201008-17440California445 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

JOHN GABOR; KAY GABOR, No. 08-17440

Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 5:07-cv-06091-RMW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010 **

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

John Gabor and Kay Gabor appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing their action alleging a conspiracy between district court judges, district

court clerks, and counsel who defended a separate civil action brought by the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gabors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Holt

v. Castaneda, 832 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.