John Gabor v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 201008-17440California445 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
JOHN GABOR; KAY GABOR, No. 08-17440
Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 5:07-cv-06091-RMW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2010 **
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
John Gabor and Kay Gabor appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing their action alleging a conspiracy between district court judges, district
court clerks, and counsel who defended a separate civil action brought by the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gabors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Holt
v. Castaneda, 832 F.2d…