USA Bussell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 200502-50495California5,554 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

After petitioning for and receiving Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief in 1995, the Bussells were indicted in 2000 for omitting from their joint bankruptcy petition their ownership of a four- unit condominium located in Park City, Utah, and their inter- ests in two corporations related to Letantia’s dermatology practice. The charges relevant to the present appeal include one count of conspiring to conceal assets in contemplation of bankruptcy, to make false statements in relation to the bank- ruptcy, and to conceal assets belonging to the bankruptcy estate; three counts of concealing assets in bankruptcy; two counts of making false statements in bankruptcy; one count of making a false oath and account; and two counts of attempt- ing to evade tax payments.

Before trial, the Bussells moved to dismiss certain of the charges on the ground that the questions posed by the bank- ruptcy forms were fundamentally ambiguous. Their motion was denied.

Trial, which began on November 20, 2001, was hard- fought and lengthy. The Bussells argued at trial that they had acted in good faith and relied on the advice of their attorneys, Jeffrey Sherman and Robert Beaudry. Both Sherman and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.