United States v. Joseph Clements

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 201009-10153California266 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10153

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00402-LDG

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JOSEPH D. CLEMENTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010 **

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Joseph D. Clements appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EH/Research retroactive application of Amendment 706 to the Sentence Guidelines provisions

governing crack cocaine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm.

Clements contends that the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.