United States v. Joseph Clements
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 201009-10153California266 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10153
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00402-LDG
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JOSEPH D. CLEMENTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2010 **
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Joseph D. Clements appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EH/Research retroactive application of Amendment 706 to the Sentence Guidelines provisions
governing crack cocaine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.