Cashman

Cashman v. City of Cotati

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 200503-15066California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GENE CASHMAN; ATHENA SUTSOS,  No. 03-15066 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. CV-99-03641-SBA/ CITY OF COTATI, a municipal  RS corporation, Northern District of Defendant-Appellee. California, Oakland

 ORDER

Filed July 15, 2005

Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Robert R. Beezer, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This court suspended consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc pending the Supreme Court’s issuance of a decision in Lingle v. Chevron USA, 125 S. Ct. 2074 (2005). The Supreme Court’s opinion in Lingle requires us to grant the City of Cotati’s petition for rehearing and to withdraw our opinion filed July 15, 2004.

We affirm the district court’s judgment in favor of the City of Cotati. See, e.g., Lentini v. Center for the Arts, 370 F.3d 837, 850 (9th Cir. 2004) (affirming district court’s judgment after trial on a different ground). Cashman’s takings claim, which alleges that the City of Cotati’s mobilehome park rent control ordinance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.