Rubio
Rubio v. Harrison
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 26, 201007-55110California211 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIO RENE RUBIO, No. 07-55110
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-04-03710-MLR
v.
MEMORANDUM *
C. M. HARRISON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2010 **
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Mario Rene Rubio appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EG/Research Rubio contends that his prison disciplinary proceedings violated his due
process rights because there was insufficient evidence to support…