Unuakhaulu

Unuakhaulu v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 200502-73837California3,991 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EHI JOSEPH UNUAKHAULU,  No. 02-73837 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A74-777-018 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED Respondent.  OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 3, 2004** Pasadena, California

Filed December 20, 2004 Amended February 14, 2005 Second Amendment July 18, 2005

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Raymond C. Fisher and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fisher

*Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

8381 8384 UNUAKHAULU v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Mark A. Karlin, Karlin & Karlin, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner.

Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Marc Van Der…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.