Mothershed

Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 200503-16878California5,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE L. MOTHERSHED, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT;

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT,

STATE OF ARIZONA; SUPREME

COURT OF ARIZONA DISCIPLINARY

COMMISSION; HEARING OFFICER; BAR

COUNSEL OF ARIZONA STATE BAR No. 03-16878 ASSOCIATION; STATE OF OKLAHOMA D.C. No.

JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT; CV-02-02375-RCB

OKLAHOMA PROFESSIONAL

ORDER

RESPONSIBILITY TRIBUNAL OF THE

SUPREME COURT, Chief Master;  AMENDING

OPINION AND

OKLAHOMA PROFESSIONAL

DENYING

RESPONSIBILITY TRIBUNAL OF THE

PETITION FOR

SUPREME COURT, Trial Panel of

REHEARING AND

February 1, 2002; GENERAL

AMENDED

COUNSEL OF OKLAHOMA BAR

OPINION

ASSOCIATION; TRIAL COUNSEL OF

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION;

RUDOLPH HARGRAVE, Oklahoma Supreme Chief Justice; MADELINE HARGRAVE, Wife; ROBERT E. LAVENDER, Justice, Oklahoma Supreme Court; MAXINE LAVENDER, Wife; JOSEPH M. WATT, Vice-Chief Justice, Oklahoma Supreme Court; 

8519 8520 MOTHERSHED v. JUSTICES

CATHY WATT, Wife; RALPH B.  HODGES, Justice, Oklahoma Supreme Court; JANELLE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.