Mothershed
Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 200503-16878California5,728 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE L. MOTHERSHED,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT;
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT,
STATE OF ARIZONA; SUPREME
COURT OF ARIZONA DISCIPLINARY
COMMISSION; HEARING OFFICER; BAR
COUNSEL OF ARIZONA STATE BAR No. 03-16878 ASSOCIATION; STATE OF OKLAHOMA D.C. No.
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT; CV-02-02375-RCB
OKLAHOMA PROFESSIONAL
ORDER
RESPONSIBILITY TRIBUNAL OF THE
SUPREME COURT, Chief Master; AMENDING
OPINION AND
OKLAHOMA PROFESSIONAL
DENYING
RESPONSIBILITY TRIBUNAL OF THE
PETITION FOR
SUPREME COURT, Trial Panel of
REHEARING AND
February 1, 2002; GENERAL
AMENDED
COUNSEL OF OKLAHOMA BAR
OPINION
ASSOCIATION; TRIAL COUNSEL OF
OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION;
RUDOLPH HARGRAVE, Oklahoma Supreme Chief Justice; MADELINE HARGRAVE, Wife; ROBERT E. LAVENDER, Justice, Oklahoma Supreme Court; MAXINE LAVENDER, Wife; JOSEPH M. WATT, Vice-Chief Justice, Oklahoma Supreme Court;
8519 8520 MOTHERSHED v. JUSTICES