Rodriguez-Preciado

United States v. Rodriguez-Preciado

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 200503-30285California12,876 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30285 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-96-00311- ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, aka  ALH-(2) Tony Rodriguez-Preciado, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2004—Portland, Oregon

Filed March 4, 2005 Amended July 29, 2005

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Wallace; Partial Dissent by Judge Berzon COUNSEL

James F. Halley, Portland, Oregon, for the defendant- appellant.

Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, and J. Russell Ratto, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

The court’s majority opinion filed March 4, 2005, slip op. 2539, and appearing at 399 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2005), is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 2544, line 9, replace “We affirm.” with “We affirm, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.