Livid Holdings Ldt v. Salomon Smith Barney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 200503-35374California5,723 words

Opinion

Opinion

D.W. Nelson COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIVID HOLDINGS LTD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 03-35374 v. D.C. No.

SALOMON SMITH BARNEY, INC.; CV-02-01607-JCC

SALOMON SMITH BARNEY HOLDINGS

ORDER

INC.; BNY CLEARING SERVICES

AMENDING

LLC, Successor in interest to Schroders & Co, Inc.; ANDREW  OPINION AND

DENYING

VAN DER VORD; ROBERT CHAMINE;

PETITION FOR

MICHAEL DURA; ROBERT HAMECS;

REHEARING AND

WILLIAM HURST; LEON KALVARIA;

REHEARING EN

ILAN KAUFTHAL; JOHN O’DONOGUE;

BANC AND

HERC SEGALAS; JED SHERWINDT;

AMENDED

JAMES STONE; FREDERICK TAYLOR;

OPINION

SAMUEL WEINHOFF,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2004—Seattle, Washington

Filed April 6, 2005 Amended August 2, 2005

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge D.W. Nelson COUNSEL

Marc M. Seltzer (argued), Susman Godfrey, LLP, Los Ange- les, California, and Paula K. Jacobi (on the briefs), Sugar, Friedberg &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.