Unuakhaulu

Unuakhaulu v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 200502-73837California3,980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EHI JOSEPH UNUAKHAULU,  No. 02-73837 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A74-777-018 ALBERTO R. GONZALES,* Attorney  AMENDED General, ORDER Respondent. AND AMENDED  OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 3, 2004** Pasadena, California

Filed December 20, 2004 Amended February 14, 2005 Second Amendment July 18, 2005 Order Amended August 4, 2005

Before: A. Wallace Tashima, Raymond C. Fisher and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Fisher

*Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

10009 10012 UNUAKHAULU v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Mark A. Karlin, Karlin & Karlin, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner.

Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.