Krotova

Krotova v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 200504-70806California3,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIOUDMILA G. KROTOVA; ANASTASIA  No. 04-70806

KROTOVA; ALEKSANDRA KROTOVA,

Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A76-853-686

A76-853-817

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A76-853-818 General,

OPINION

Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 17, 2005—Seattle, Washington

Filed August 4, 2005

Before: Harry Pregerson, Susan P. Graber, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Graber

10085 10088 KROTOVA v. GONZALES

COUNSEL

Angela Bortel and Christopher A. Kerosky, Kerosky & Asso- ciates, San Francisco, California, for the petitioners.

Jennifer Keeney, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Lead Petitioner Lioudmila Krotova and her daughters, Anastasia Krotova and Aleksandra Krotova, who are all natives and citizens of Russia, petition for review of a final order of removal by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The BIA denied their applications for asylum and withholding of removal because it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.