Sharee Butler v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 201008-17551California689 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAREE BUTLER, No. 08-17551

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00755-LKK-

DAD

v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; MICHELLE MEMORANDUM *

PEREZ; CITY OF SACRAMENTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 9, 2010 ** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Sharee Butler sued the City of Sacramento, the Sacramento Police

Department, and Sacramento Police Officer Michelle Perez. She alleged violations

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of her Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and violations

under several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.