Sharee Butler v. City of Sacramento
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 201008-17551California689 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 11 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHAREE BUTLER, No. 08-17551
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00755-LKK-
DAD
v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; MICHELLE MEMORANDUM *
PEREZ; CITY OF SACRAMENTO
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 9, 2010 ** San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Sharee Butler sued the City of Sacramento, the Sacramento Police
Department, and Sacramento Police Officer Michelle Perez. She alleged violations
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of her Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and violations
under several…