Ortiz Limones v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 201007-71952California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FLORENCIO ORTIZ LIMONES; No. 07-71952

CONCEPCION DIAZ DELGADO,

Agency Nos. A095-180-619 Petitioners, A075-672-801

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2010 ** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, FISHER and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Florencio Ortiz Limones and Concepcion Diaz Delgado, husband and wife,

petition pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioners’ application for cancellation

of removal. We dismiss the petition in part and deny it in part.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.