Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v. Grokster Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 200503-55894California1,005 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS,
INC.; COLUMBIA PICTURES
INDUSTRIES, INC.; DISNEY
ENTERPRISES, INC.; PARAMOUNT
PICTURES CORPORATION; TWENTIETH
CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION;
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLP, f/k/a
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC.; NEW
LINE CINEMA CORPORATION; TIME
WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY,
LP; ATLANTIC RECORDING
CORPORATION; ATLANTIC RHINO
VENTURES, INC., d/b/a Rhino No. 03-55894 Entertainment, Inc.; ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.; D.C. No.
LONDON-SIRE RECORDS, INC., LP; CV-01-08541-SVW
WARNER BROTHERS RECORDS, INC.;
WEA INTERNATIONAL INC.; WARNER
MUSIC LATINA, INC., f/k/a WEA Latina, Inc.; ARISTA RECORDS, INC.;
BAD BOY RECORDS; CAPITOL
RECORDS, INC.; HOLLYWOOD
RECORDS, INC.; INTERSCOPE
RECORDS; LAFACE RECORDS;
MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY; RCA
RECORDS LABEL, a unit of BMG Music d/b/a BMG Entertainment;
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.;
10593 10594 MGM STUDIOS v. GROKSTER